Tuesday, August 31, 2004
Republican secrecy fetish trumps democracy, again
This is too much (from Kevin Drum):
Like the last post, very Heller, very Orwell. We have a party that claims to fight for freedom and democracy, but really offers only fear demands blind loyalty to our "resolute" brave leader.
I don't really care about immigration policy all that much, but Colorado Representative Tom Tancredo does. So he tried to get his views adopted in the Republican party platform.
When that failed, he decided to see if he could gin up a floor fight at the convention. This was more political theater than anything else, but even so he ran into an unusual problem:
There are two ways to bring a matter to the floor: One is to convince six state delegations to support the motion for a floor debate—a virtual impossibility, Tancredo realized; the other is to get 19 members of the platform committee to support bringing a matter to the floor. This latter route seemed doable to Tancredo, save for one problem: The congressman couldn't find out who, exactly, was on the platform committee. Running the platform process with all the discipline and secrecy that's come to be expected from the Bush White House, the RNC, citing security concerns, refused to divulge the identities of the handpicked delegates who served on the platform committee—even, in some cases, to other members of the platform committee.
The names of the platform committee members are a secret? For "security reasons"? Has the party leadership gone completely insane? (That's a rhetorical question, of course. No need to answer.)
Like the last post, very Heller, very Orwell. We have a party that claims to fight for freedom and democracy, but really offers only fear demands blind loyalty to our "resolute" brave leader.